Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 1|回復: 0

Public Ministry should be the holder of leniency agreements, says American judge

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
5
發表於 13:28:24 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式

In the dispute over ownership of leniency agreements, the victor should be the Public Prosecutor's Office, at least for US federal judge Peter Messitte. In an interview with ConJur , the judge defended the authority's competence, claiming its role as guardian of criminal law.


Brenno Grillo
Peter Messitte defended that Cade or MP be the holders of leniency agreements.
ConJur
“Cade is another option, as it has the B2B Lead ability to defend the economy,” he said. Messitte also stated that the use of plea bargains in Brazil is very similar to that used in the USA, because they deal with crimes that involve conspiracy ( conspiracy , in English, which is a crime that only exists in the United States).

"These people who have already confessed their guilt are helping authorities identify other people responsible. And this represents the intention of the United States' plea bargain ."

In cases of abuse, which would involve arresting someone just to get a confession, "there is the option of Habeas Corpus", he stated.

Read the interview:

Conjur — How do you analyze the use of whistleblowing in Brazil?
Peter Messitte — I see similarities with the USA. I saw that whistleblowing is being used here especially in “lava Jato”. These people who have already confessed their guilt are helping authorities identify other people responsible. And this represents the intention of the United States' plea bargain .

Conjur — And the abuses committed through the institute?
Peter Messitte — If there is an abuse in the use of plea bargaining, it would be the idea of ​​detaining someone just to get a confession. If this occurs, in both countries, there is the option of Habeas Corpus. I remember a conversation I had with Rodrigo Janot [former PGR] in which he told me that 80% of “lava jet” allegations were made with people out of custody. They weighed the benefits of the agreement and accepted it.



Conjur — Who should have the authority to sign leniency agreements in Brazil?
Peter Messitte — It must be the Public Ministry. Because its main objective is to enforce criminal law. Cade is another option, as it has the ability to defend the economy. It would also be interesting if an agreement signed by the agency was approved by the Public Ministry or the judge.

回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|自動贊助|z

GMT+8, 14:02 , Processed in 1.263515 second(s), 18 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |